Organization Spotlight

Advocates for D20 Kids

A focused profile of public activity, affiliations, policy goals, and documented connections affecting Academy District 20.

Logo of Advocates for D20 Kids, featuring stylized mountains and an open book symbolizing education and community in Colorado Springs.

Organization Overview

Advocates for D20 Kids publicly presents itself as a grassroots organization advocating for parental rights, school choice, and traditional values within Academy School District 20 (D20) in Colorado Springs.

Founders and Leadership

  • Daniel Cole: Communications consultant identified as a key website administrator and content creator, linked through shared digital fingerprints across multiple advocacy sites. Advocates for D20 Kids WordPress Users
  • Joel Sorensen: Key figure involved in organizational strategy and coordination, frequently contributing to leadership and advocacy efforts within the group.
  • Brian Moody: Public face and chairman of the group, frequently serving as spokesperson and primary community liaison.
  • Derrick Wilburn: Co-founder, known conservative activist associated with Rocky Mountain Black Conservatives and Charis Bible College, influential in shaping group strategy and rhetoric. Also currently serving as as a director on the Academy District 20 school board.

Mission, Public Statements, and Goals

  • Officially advocates for “academic excellence, parental rights, school choice, and strong character.”
  • Publicly positions itself as a nonpartisan entity prioritizing parental control over education policy and content within schools.
  • Vocal opposition to curriculum or content labeled as “indoctrination,” specifically targeting LGBTQ-related materials and topics.

Political Affiliations and Endorsements

  • Implicitly supports conservative candidates in local school board elections, including Amy Shandy and Derrick Wilburn.
  • Collaborates closely with conservative groups, notably Moms for Liberty, Christian nationalist churches and organizations, and local GOP networks, to mobilize support and amplify influence.

Activities, Campaigns, and Protests

  • Successfully led efforts to remove books from school libraries, labeling them as obscene or inappropriate for minors, including prominent cases involving LGBTQ-themed literature.
  • Targeted LGBTQ-inclusive student clubs, proposing policy changes to restrict their operations and visibility within schools.
  • Regularly organizes attendance and vocal participation at school board meetings, significantly impacting local educational policy and discourse.

Connections to Other Groups and Networks

  • Strong ties with religious organizations, including Charis Bible College, Church For All Nations, and Radiant Church, leveraging their support and resources for advocacy and electioneering events.
  • Closely aligned with Colorado Springs Republican political infrastructure, receiving endorsements and political backing from GOP figures and networks.

Media Coverage and Public Perception

  • Local and statewide media portray the group as influential but controversial, highlighting its role in school policy changes and culture-war issues.
  • Progressive outlets criticize it for fostering division and undermining inclusivity, labeling it as anti-LGBTQ and far-right.
  • Supporters praise the group for championing traditional values and parental rights, while opponents accuse it of censorship and intolerance.

Social Media and Messaging

  • Maintains active profiles on platforms like Facebook and Twitter, frequently mobilizing supporters around issues like book bans and parental rights.
  • Internal communications (via Discord) have revealed more aggressive, confrontational rhetoric not publicly acknowledged, raising transparency concerns.

Financial and Organizational Structure

  • No public financial disclosures; operates primarily through grassroots donations and volunteer support.
  • Likely structured informally or as an unincorporated association; no clear nonprofit or PAC filings identified as of yet.

Ethical and Transparency Concerns

  • Presents as grassroots while driven by professionally coordinated operations, raising serious ethical questions about authenticity and transparency.
  • Patterns indicate classic astroturfing signals.
  • Critics advocate for greater scrutiny and public disclosure to clarify true operational and financial structures.